Share on TelegramTimothy Pawl In Defense Of Extended Conciliar Christology A Philosophical Essay
User Rating: Be the first one!
Author: Timothy Pawl
Added by: carlosdam01
Added Date: 2021-08-19
Language: eng
Subjects: Theology
Collections: folkscanomy philosophy, folkscanomy, additional collections
Pages Count: 300
PPI Count: 300
PDF Count: 1
Total Size: 155.03 MB
PDF Size: 1.61 MB
Extensions: pdf, gz, html, zip, torrent
License: Public Domain Mark 1.0
Downloads: 177
Views: 227
Total Files: 15
Media Type: texts
Total Files: 7
PDF
Timothy Pawl In Defense of Extended Conc...say pdf
Last Modified: 2021-08-19 21:08:06
Download
Size: 1.61 MB
GZ
Timothy Pawl In Defense of Extended Conc...html gz
Last Modified: 2021-08-19 22:11:36
Download
Size: 8.54 MB
TXT
Timothy Pawl In Defense of Extended Conc...jvu txt
Last Modified: 2021-08-19 22:17:08
Download
Size: 688.23 KB
GZ
Timothy Pawl In Defense of Extended Conc...json gz
Last Modified: 2021-08-19 22:15:19
Download
Size: 3.10 KB
GZ
Timothy Pawl In Defense of Extended Conc... txt gz
Last Modified: 2021-08-19 22:16:53
Download
Size: 208.61 KB
ZIP
Timothy Pawl In Defense of Extended Conc...jp2 zip
Last Modified: 2021-08-19 21:41:32
Download
Size: 119.80 MB
TORRENT
timothy pawl in defense of extended conc...torrent
Last Modified: 2021-10-11 21:05:42
Download
Size: 10.65 KB
Description
Introduction 1
I. The Extensions and Some Initial Justification for
Choosing Them 2
II. Some Points on Method 3
II.a. Concerning the Assumption of Conciliar Christology 4
II.b. On Mystery 5
II.c. On Privileging the Councils 6
II.d. Extensions Cumulatively Assumed 7
II.e. The Division of Labor 8
II.f. The Types of Philosophical Objections Considered 9
II.g. My Reliance on Thomas Aquinas 10
III. The Plan of the Book 11
1. Preliminaries 13
I. Introduction 13
II. The Importance of the Ecumenical Councils 13
III. The Teaching of the Ecumenical Councils 16
IV. The Metaphysical Terms and Concepts 19
IV.a. “Supposit” and “Person” 19
IV.b. Nature: Abstract or Concrete 22
IV.c. What Concrete Natures Can Do 28
V. Conclusion 30
PART 1. NATURAL EXTENSIONS
2. Multiple Interpretations of “Multiple Incarnations” 35
I. Introduction 35
II. Four Questions about the Possibility of Multiple Incarnations 36
II.a. The Natural Question 36
II.b. The Personal Question 37
II.c. The Temporal Question 37
II.d. The Sharing Question 38
III. The Thomistic Understanding of Multiple Incarnations 39
III.a. The Thomistic Answer to the Natural Question 39
III.b. The Thomistic Answer to the Personal Question 41
III.c. The Thomistic Answer to the Temporal Question 44
III.d. The Thomistic Answer to the Sharing Question 46
IV. The Full Thomistic Picture 48
IV.a. The Full Thomistic Picture Presented 48
IV.b. The Full Thomistic Picture Ontologically Sketched 49
V. Conclusion 53
3. Objections to the Possibility of Multiple Incarnations 54
I. Introduction 54
II. The Objection from Incompatible Predications 55
II.a. A Statement of the Objection 55
II.b. Responses to the Objection 56
II.b.1. The Reply from Denying the Predications 56
II.b.2. The Reply from Qua-Modifying the Predications 58
II.b.3. Denying the Incompatibility of the Predicates 64
III. The Objection from Too Many Thinkers 67
III.a. A Statement of the Objection 67
III.b. A Response to the Objection 68
IV. Brian Hebblethwaite’s Objection from Coexistent
Communities 70
IV.a. A Statement of the Objection 71
IV.b. A Response to the Objection 75
V. Brian Hebblethwaite’s Objection from Divine Subjecthood 79
V.a. A Statement of the Objection 80
V.b. A Response to the Objection 81
VI. Eric Mascall’s Objection from Conferred Personality 83
VI.a. A Statement of the Objection 83
VI.b. A Response to the Objection 85
VII. Michael Schmaus on the Incarnation of the Father or
Holy Spirit 86
VII.a. A Statement of the Objection 87
VII.b. A Response to the Objection 87
VIII. Kenneth Baker’s Presentation of the Objection to
Multiple Incarnations 90
VIII.a. A Statement of the Objection 91
VIII.b. A Response to the Objection 91
IX. Conclusion 92
4. Christ and the Interim State 93
I. Introduction 93
II. Christ’s Interim State 94
III. The Argument Presented 95
IV. The Premises 96
IV.a. The Word Permanently Assumed Whatever He
Assumed in the Incarnation 97
IV.b. The Word Assumed CHN in the Incarnation 99
IV.c. During the Interim State, Christ’s Human Nature
Did Not Exist 100
IV.d. No Real Relations without Relata 100
IV.e. Assumption is a Real Relation 101
V. Potential Responses to the Argument 102
V.a. Denying Premise 3 103
V.a.1. The Abstract Nature View 104
x Table of Contents
V.a.2. The One Part View 105
V.a.3. The Mere Parts View 106
V.a.4. The Survivalist View 107
V.a.5. Summary of the Problems for these Responses 109
V.b. Denying Premise 2 109
V.c. Denying Premise 1 113
VI. Conclusion 115
PART 2. VOLITIONAL EXTENSIONS
5. The Freedom of Christ 119
I. Introduction 119
II. The Created Will of Christ and its Freedom 120
III. Free Will 123
IV. Third Constantinople and the Freedom of Christ 125
IV.a. The Text 126
IV.b. A Presentation of Argument 126
IV.c. A Reply to the Argument 128
V. Conclusion 131
6. Impeccability and Temptation 132
I. Introduction 132
II. The Witness of Tradition 133
III. The Problem 135
III.a. The View as Presented in the Literature 135
III.b. The Argument Formalized 136
IV. Responses that Deny the Truth of Premise 1 139
IV.a. The Epistemic Response 139
IV.b. A Psychological Response 143
V. Can Something be Peccable and Impeccable? 151
V.a. Christ’s Powers and the Ability to Sin 151
V.b. The Aptness Conditions for the Predicates, “Peccable”
and “Impeccable” 153
V.c. Objections and Questions 158
V.c.1 What is the Scope of “s” in the Truth Conditions? 158
V.c.2 Must Natures have Natures, then? 160
V.c.3 What of Leftow’s Bloody Hand? 160
VI. A Summary Application of the Apparatus of the Chapter 162
VII. Conclusion 163
PART 3. INTELLECTUAL EXTENSIONS
7. Christ’s Knowledge in Relation to our Wills 167
I. Introduction 167
II. The Knowledge of Christ 169
II.a. Aquinas on the Knowledge of Christ 170
Table of Contents xi
II.a.1. Acquired Knowledge 170
II.a.2. Beatific Knowledge 171
II.a.3. Infused Knowledge 173
II.b. Others on Christ’s Human Knowledge 176
II.c. Scriptural Worries about the Foreknowledge Thesis 179
III. The Argument Formalized 182
IV. The Relation between Truth and Being 183
V. Objections 185
V.a. Lady Philosophy’s Objection 186
V.b. A Disanalogy between Mere Human Intellectual States and
Christ’s Intellectual States 188
V.c. A Disanalogy between Future and Non-Future Truths 188
V.d. Why Aquinas’s Silence Concerning This Reply? 189
V.e. What if We Focus on Belief, Rather than Knowledge? 191
VI. Conclusion 193
8. Christ’s Knowledge in Relation to his Will 194
I. Introduction 194
II. The Problem of Deliberation 195
III. The Auxiliary Theses 197
III.a. Certainty Precludes Deliberation 197
III.b. Deliberation Requires Options 200
III.c. Freedom Requires Deliberation 201
IV. The Argument from Deliberation Presented 203
V. Responses to the Argument from Deliberation 205
V.a. Deny 6 and 7 205
V.b. Challenge Certainty Precludes Deliberation, Part 1 206
V.c. Challenge Certainty Precludes Deliberation, Part 2 207
V.d. Distinguish Certainty Precludes Deliberation 208
V.e. Deny Freedom Requires Deliberation 208
VI. The Problem of Explanatory Priority 209
VII. The Argument Presented 211
VIII. Responses to the Problem of Explanatory Priority 213
VIII.a. The Pruss/Rota Response 213
VIII.b. Occurrent vs Dispositional Knowledge 214
VIII.c. Deny Premise 13 215
VIII.d. Distinguish Senses of Priority 216
IX. Conclusion 221
Conclusion 223
You May Also Like
We will be happy to hear your thoughts
